Fixed-scope services

Buy a measurable workflow outcome, not an open-ended automation project

Each engagement starts with one process, one owner, explicit systems, a failure path, and written acceptance tests. We use deterministic rules where possible and keep human review around consequential actions.

Request an auditView offers
Diagnose

Workflow teardown

$149

For teams that know the process is painful but are not ready to choose a tool.

  • Current-state process map
  • Exception and access risks
  • ROI assumptions and baseline
  • Platform shortlist
  • Fixed pilot quote
Target delivery: 2 business days after complete inputs. Credited toward a pilot started within 30 days.
Prove

Bounded automation pilot

From $750

For one stable workflow that can be tested with reversible records.

  • One trigger and one primary outcome
  • Up to three connected systems
  • Validation, retry, and review path
  • Representative acceptance tests
  • Handoff notes and recorded walkthrough
Final scope and price depend on access, connectors, data quality, and consequence of failure.
Operate

Production setup

From $1,500

For a validated pilot that needs production controls and an accountable handoff.

  • Production credentials and least privilege
  • Monitoring and failure notifications
  • Rollback and recovery notes
  • Owner training and change record
  • 30-day defect correction window
Software subscriptions, custom vendor fees, and major scope changes are quoted separately.
Maintain

Workflow care

From $250/mo

For active workflows that need routine review without a full-time automation operator.

  • Monthly run and failure review
  • Credential-expiry coordination
  • Minor mapping and rule adjustments
  • Change log and monthly summary
  • Escalation for material redesign
Includes a defined monthly change allowance; unused work does not roll over.
Delivery process

Small scope, visible evidence, controlled release

  1. 1. DescribeSystems, trigger, volume, owner, desired result.
  2. 2. DiagnoseMap exceptions, permissions, economics, and risk.
  3. 3. PilotUse reversible test records and acceptance criteria.
  4. 4. ReleaseDocument ownership, monitoring, rollback, and change control.

Good fit

  • Stable repetitive work with a clear owner
  • Accessible systems, APIs, exports, or email events
  • A measurable baseline and reversible pilot
  • A team member available for decisions and testing

Not a fit

  • Bypassing platform rules, identity checks, or access controls
  • High-consequence autonomous decisions without review
  • Processes that change weekly or have no accountable owner
  • Requests that depend on fabricated data, reviews, or credentials
Next step

Describe one workflow in about five minutes

You will receive a scope response before any payment or access request.

Request an audit